Wireless carriers lament that they don't want their networks to be dumb pipes anymore. But a recent case involving a Boston-area teen and his $18,000 bill from Verizon Wireless -- racked up by tethering
If we don't tie fulfillment, billing and service management more tightly together ... we may compromise hundreds of billions of dollars of revenue opportunity and a tremendous amount of utility.
President, CIMI Corp.
More billing embarrassments are inevitable as carriers continue to deliver third-party apps hawking goods and services.
"We need policy management for service decisions while the service is being invoked," said telecom consultant Tom Nolle, president of CIMI Corp. "Where we're heading would make it possible for Little Johnny to buy a car and bill it to his cell phone … [but] Little Johnny can't be allowed to buy a car and get a do-over. We can solve the problems of today just by forgiving the debt. We can't do that for the problems of tomorrow."
When wireless carriers had to support only voice calls and text messages, their existing operations support systems (OSS) and billing support systems (BSS) had been sufficient, Nolle said. Those systems automatically capture and catalogue account activity after it occurs but only spit out reports as needed for monthly statements or customer Web portals that don't promise real-time usage stats.
As the industry becomes increasingly application- and service-driven, a careless attitude toward revamping the wireless OSS/BSS model for next-generation networks will cost carriers, Nolle said.
"If we don't tie fulfillment, billing and service management more tightly together, what could happen is we have a choice of forcing unreasonable bills on unwilling consumers or shutting down services," he said. "We may compromise hundreds of billions of dollars of revenue opportunity and a tremendous amount of utility to customers."
Wireless 'ecosystem' may depend on real-time billing overhaul
The rise of app stores is changing the market dynamics -- wedging wireless carriers in among consumers, retailers and application developers -- and driving the need for more real-time billing systems, Nolle said.
"The trouble with the new services developing is that the stuff you have to pay for can get buried in the experience," he said. This set-up creates a service-layer problem because the overall experience where the pay services are embedded doesn't typically carry a service charge.
If carriers can't untangle this dilemma, it could easily stifle mobile application development and upend the "ecosystem" of carriers, developers and retailers selling goods and services through these platforms, according to Sara Kaufman, mobile strategies analyst at Ovum.
"The complexity of the relationship … is actually hampering, to some extent, the development of more sophisticated third-party apps," Kaufman said. "Most of the third-party app vendors … I have talked to will go on and on about how difficult it is to navigate the operator's payment and billing systems."
Capping overages with real-time billing systems
It's not that operators don't have the technology to integrate real-time billing systems with network policy. All four major U.S. carriers offer overage protection services to family plan customers, most selling it for $2 to $5 per month; Sprint Nextel Corp. is the only one of the four to offer it free of charge.
The services enable parents to create custom restrictions for their children on calls, texts, data usage, content purchases and handset features. The controls shut down service under a variety of policies -- based on usage, time and/or phone numbers -- while allowing usage to reopen for emergency calls or an approved list of contacts.
More intelligent OSS and real-time billing systems can apply policy and enable the network to make that possible, according to Joanne Steinberg, marketing director at Bridgewater Systems, a vendor of "mobile personalization" software.
Bridgewater's myPolicy platform -- launched last year and in use by one undisclosed European carrier -- is a smartphone application that works with a policy controller in the carrier's core network to make decisions based on real-time billing information, Steinberg said. Users track and set dollar or megabyte limits from their handset, deciding when to alert or cut themselves off.
'Bill shock' publicity could lead to U.S. FCC action
Last year, the European Union passed a "bill shock" law that caps roaming voice and data charges by European carriers, but U.S. carriers are under no obligation -- yet -- to be proactive about cutting off service when customers go over their plan limits.
Responding to consumer uproar over the recent $18,000 Verizon Wireless billing standoff, regulators have elbowed their way into the issue. The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) announced last week that it would seek comments on whether carriers should be required to alert customers to -- or prevent -- bill shock caused by unwitting data overages.
The real-time billing services offered by U.S. carriers are notably optional services for a reason, said Deepa Karthikeyan, senior analyst at Current Analysis. "In my opinion, carriers are not automatically sending out alerts, because they would lose a chunk of revenue from overage charges," she said. "While dramatic bills like the $18,000 Verizon Wireless one usually go away," Karthikeyan said, "I suspect that users are required to fork up smaller overage charges."
Now that carriers have gotten a taste of revenue from selling overage protection plans, they may be unlikely to offer it widely as a standard automated service, according to Kaufman.
"I don't hear the carriers talking about that being a big priority for them," she said. "All of the family usage tools are probably of more interest to the operators because they can charge people for it … [and] 70% of carrier subscribers are part of family services."
Let us know what you think about the story; email: Jessica Scarpati, News Writer